Route 443 currently links Jerusalem and the Tel Aviv area (Modiin and the airport, for example). 40, 000 Israelis (and tourists on their way to the airport) use it daily as an alternative to the main road linking Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Fifteen kilometres of route 443 is built inside the West Bank, including on private Palestinian land.
The problem: Palestinians are not allowed to use the road.
The road used to be a major traffic artery to Ramallah for Palestinians living southwest of the city. The High Court only allowed the Israeli authorities to build the new road if it served the local population. Now however, the local population, some 35, 000 people, are forced to travel on a different route, one that is much longer, windy and in disrepair.
For a while Palestinians and Israelis shared the road. But in the wake of the second intifada in 2000, and following several attacks on Israeli vehicles where people were killed, Palestinians were increasingly prohibited from using route 443. By 2002, a full prohibition was in force. Of course, those who committed the crimes should be punished, but is it fair to punish all the people living in the area?
An Israeli NGO, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, petitioned the High Court on behalf of the six villages affected by the prohibition. To date, their efforts have been unsuccessful.
This is not the only case where a road is built in the West Bank by the Israeli authorities, which Palestinians are prohibited from using. Palestinians are forbidden to use, or are restricted in their use of more than 300 kilometres of roads in the West Bank; Israelis on the other hand, are free to use these same roads without restrictions. See the map here.
I support Israel punishing acts of violence and terror. I am okay with Israel imposing robust security measures to protect people's lives. But within reason. Israel has the duty to protect the lives of everyone living on its territory, including people living on territory it occupies. If the lives of Israelis is in danger by using this road, the Israeli authorities could have easily found an alternative route, within Israel's own territory, to provide safe passage. Instead, the Israeli authorities chose to disrupt the lives of Palestinians living near the road, restrict their movement and cut them off from important economic, social and cultural ties. It makes me furious.
How is it ok to punish entire villages for the acts of a few? And should the convenience of this road to Israelis really outweigh the basic needs of the local population to a decent livelihood?
46 days to go...